PLF in the Supreme Court

Property Rights

• Property Owners’ Riparian Rights Should Be Respected
  

  Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida DEP

Environmental Regulations

• Costs and benefits must be weight in environmental regulation
  

  Entergy Corp. v. EPA

• Promoting Regulation That Is Pro-jobs and Pro-environment
  Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. Corps of Engineers
• Requiring that only actually insured persons can file lawsuits
  

  Summers v. Earth Island Institute

• Feds wrongfully charge Mississippi developer with filling a "wetland"
  

  United States v. Lucas

• Supreme Court should underscore and clarify how Rapanos reins in regulators
  

  United States v. McWane

• On sonar and other issues, Ninth Circuit overderfers to environmentalists
  

  Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council

Individual Rights

• Upholding the right of public employees not to pay for lawsuits that don't concern them
  

  Locke v. Karass

  Oregon justices defy United States Supreme Court to expand tort law
  

  Philip Morris v. Williams

• Rights are abridged when Unions coerce workers to join and contribute
  

  Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association

Discrimination and Preference

• Racial gerrymandering is unconstitutional
  

  Bartlett v. Strickland

• Cincinnati's race-based bias in contracting violates the Constitution
  

  Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati

• PLF defends Michigan Civil Rights Initiative
  

  Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm; Cantrell v. Granholm

• Race-based exclusions on the use of public land are impermissible
  

  State of Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiin Affairs